SAN DIEGO -

With three models rated as total quality leaders, Volkswagen of America was named the best full-line automaker in Strategic Vision’s 2011 Total Quality Index released Tuesday.

Propelling the German OEM to the top spot with a score of 881 was Strategic Vision tapping the Golf, Jetta and Tiguan as segment leaders. Analysts based their assessment on attributes of design and exterior styling that particularly impressed owners along with many other cues of quality that were very impactful upon owners.

"Volkswagen of America is excited about the outstanding recognition that our company and vehicles have received in the 2011 Total Quality Index,” stated Jonathan Browning, president and chief executive officer of Volkswagen Group of America.

"It is clear that Volkswagen is top of mind among our growing customer base and that our vehicles continue to provide a stimulating driving experience," Browning added.

Strategic Vision also highlighted Ford Motor Co. had the second best total quality score (863), just ahead of American Honda Corp. and Nissan Motor Corp. that both scored 862.

Analysts explained Ford’s total quality score received bolstering from segment leaders Mustang Coupe and Convertible, Flex, F-150, and 250/350 along with a number of other models that ranked very high.

Strategic Vision’s study did capture that Ford owners reported a higher penetration (28 percent) than the industry average (24 percent) level of problems. But the strength of Ford’s design, other important quality cues and innovation, along with brand strength kept sales and total quality scores high, according to Strategic Vision.

While another study was critical of Ford’s technology, Strategic Vision chairman and founder Darrel Edwards wasn’t. Edwards first referenced how J.D. Power and Associates was critical of Ford when the firm recently released its 2011 U.S. Initial Quality Study.

“Ford — a quality leader in our study — innovated, and we who count problems discovered that Ford received a large number of complaints primarily about one thing, Sync. — an in-car connectivity system,” Edwards began. “Does that warrant their ‘tumble’ in some quality metrics?”

Edwards does not think so.

“Decades ago, we decided to measure ‘quality’ from the ‘total’ perspective of the driver/owner because this is how people actually judge ‘quality’ in terms of the decision to purchase or not,” Edwards declared.

“The number of complaints is considered, but there is absolutely justification — even requirement — for also considering the total positive experience created for the owner/driver,” he continued.

While coming right behind Ford, Strategic Vision said Honda continued a strong run of performances with Civic Hybrid, Accord Crosstour, Odyssey and Ridgeline being segment winners.

“The Honda Ridgeline is basically in a class of its own among standard pickups, having been the segment leader since its introduction,” Strategic Vision interjected.

As a brand, the firm insisted Nissan is starting to show the results of “hard work and improvement,” while securing a tie for second place in the overall total quality charts. The Nissan Maxima was the large car total quality winner in what Strategic Vision called a very strong segment.

Elsewhere, the index release indicated Chrysler Group also showed “signs of resurgence” as the Dodge Challenger and redesigned Jeep Grand Cherokee were named winners in their popular respective segments.

Though not listed as a winner, analysts mentioned the Chrysler Town & Country ranked second behind Odyssey in the minivan segment, and “with the right innovation, may threaten for leadership again.”

When just considering the problem impact score, Strategic Vision acknowledged Toyota Motor Sales would be considered the industry leader with the least problems. But the firm said owners are still looking for more of a “total quality” experience such as they have found with segment leader Sequoia.

Perhaps the biggest story among luxury manufacturers was what Strategic Vision described as the “comeback” of Land Rover and Jaguar.

Analysts noted Jaguar XJ was a leader — and with the highest total quality score in the industry — in the luxury cars segment. They also highlighted the Land Rover LR4 took the nod in the near-luxury SUV category.

In other luxury segments, Strategic Vision indicated BMW had two leaders with the 1-Series and X6, but the Mercedes C-Class took leadership in the near-luxury car segment.

More Explanation about What “Quality” Is

Expanding on its points about why Ford’s technology should not be confused with a lack of quality, Strategic Vision discussed two particular units, the Volkswagen Jetta and Hyundai Sonata.

Analysts said these two vehicles tied for the top position of total quality in the midsize car segment. They conceded both vehicles had a higher incidence of owners reporting problems (30 percent) than the segment average (22 percent) “which isn’t a good start to a customer’s perception of quality.”

However, Strategic Vision contends the impact of those problems on the customer’s perception of quality is negligible because few customers (only 1 in 20) experienced a “serious” problem, which is often fixed immediately at the dealership.

Then, and what analysts think is most important, vehicle attributes from exterior styling to interior room combined with the emotional benefits delivered by the driving and ownership experience create some of the highest perceptions of delight and love for their vehicle.

“When customers explicitly state ‘I love [this] about my vehicle,’ it results in increased sales,” explained Alexander Edwards, president of Strategic Vision.

“We explicitly measure the emotional impact of each vehicle attribute and ask the customer what they love about their vehicle,” Edwards continued. “Jetta and Sonata owners report more love than most all of their competitors. This is why it is no surprise to us that the Jetta and Sonata have had their best sales ever with their 2011 models.”

Christopher Chaney, Strategic Vision’s vice president of automotive research, elaborated on the points.

“Anyone who rejects the concept of the ‘total quality’ of a customer’s experience being most important should beware, and ask themselves about how the emotional experience (intensity) and quality all work together,” Chaney declared.

“Case in point, when Apple released the first generation iPhone it had a number of problems unique to its innovative position,” Chaney offered. “I suppose it could have been subjected to a simple quality study which would have deemed it among the worst of solidly built, but innovatively boring, competitors.

“However, billions of dollars in profit and $335 per share later, competitors to Apple are desperately chasing the iPhone’s tail winds — with some being left in the dust,” he went on to say.

“When our total quality data is used correctly, companies don’t find themselves asking ‘How did we get so far behind?’ Rather they ask, ‘how do we remain in the lead,” Chaney added.

Who is also winning big in the total quality race? Strategic Vision believes it’s the buyers.

“Quality is becoming an increasingly more elusive concept for those in the automotive industry that don’t understand its total nature,” Darrel Edwards surmised. Even Webster’s dictionary struggles with a definition that barely defines the attribute.

“Since transmissions are not falling out, and basic — but foundationally important — security issues are solid with most cars, our decision is to measure quality from the total perspective of the driver which is essential to understanding future success,” Edwards continued.

Study Background

Strategic Vision reiterated its Total Quality Index asks buyers to rate all aspects of the ownership experience from buying and owning to performance and driving.

The company thinks its analysis is “much more than simply counting problems, although problems and the impact the problems have on the customers’ experiences are included in the calculation.

“Results from studies that measure the number of problems or the overall satisfaction of a vehicle do not measure the customers’ commitment to, advocacy for, loyalty, or the delight and love of their vehicles accurately,” Strategic Vision went on to say.

Analysts said the Total Quality Index was calculated from 37,069 buyers who bought 2011 models in September to December of 2010.

Strategic Vision has presented the Total Quality Awards annually since 1995.

Strategic Vision 2011 Total Quality Awards
 Automaker  Score
 Volkswagen of America  881
 Ford Motor Co.  863
 American Honda Motor Corp.  862
 Nissan Motor Corp.  862
 Industry Average  861
 General Motors Corp.  860
 Toyota Motors Sales  854
 Chrysler Group  853
 Hyundai Motor America  852

 

Small Car Segment
 Model  Score
 Honda Civic Hybrid  881
 Ford Fiesta Sedan  873
 Ford Focus  858
 Honda Civic  849
 Mazda3 Sedan  846
 Hyundai Elantra Sedan  843
 Chevrolet Cruze  841
 Kia Rio Sedan  835
 Mitsubishi Lancer  834
 Nissan Sentra  831
 Toyota Corolla  823
 Honda Insight  809
 Nissan Versa Sedan  807
   
 Segment Average  837

 

Small Multi-Function Segment
 Model  Score
 Volkswagen Golf  871
 Nissan Juke  866
 Nissan Cube  859
 Ford Fiesta Hatchback  857
 Honda Fit  844
 Kia Soul  839
 Chevrolet HHR  830
 Dodge Caliber  830
 Nissan Versa Hatchback  827
 Mazda5  811
 Chrysler PT Cruiser  802
   
 Segment Average  840
Midsize Car Segment
 Model  Score
 Volkswagen Jetta Sedan  876
 Hyundai Sonata  876
 Subaru Legacy  873
 Suzuki Kizashi  873
 Ford Fusion  871
 Nissan Altima  865
 Honda Accord Sedan  864
 Chevrolet Malibu  863
 Subaru Impreza Sedan  861
 Toyota Camry  857
 Buick Regal  853
 Dodge Avenger  848
 Toyota Prius  845
 Chrysler Sebring Sedan  837
 Kia Optima  829
 Mazda6 Sedan  824
   
 Segment Average  861
Midsize Multi-Function Segment
 Model  Score
 Honda Accord Crosstour  889 
 Subaru Outback  867
 Subaru Impreza Wagon   865
 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon  853
   
 Segment Average  869
Large Car Segment
 Model  Score
 Nissan Maxima  888
 Ford Taurus  877
 Buick LaCrosse  874
 Buick Lucerne  873
 Dodge Charger  862
 Chevrolet Impala  831
   
 Segment Average  866
Near-Luxury Car Segment
 Model  Score
 Mercedes-Benz C-Class  903
 Audi A4 Sedan  900
 Lexus IS Sedan  897
 BMW 3-Series Sedan  897
 Acura TL  895
 Lincoln MKS  892
 Infiniti G37 Sedan  890
 Volkswagen CC  888
 Volvo S60  884
 Acura TSX  883
 Lincoln MKZ  875
 Lexus ES350  872
 Cadillac DTS  871
 Toyota Avalon  863
 Infiniti G25  863
 Lexus HS Sedan  846
   
 Segment Average  888
Luxury Car Segment
 Model  Score
 Jaguar XJ  929
 BMW 7-Series Sedan  910
 Lexus LS  909
 Jaguar XF  906
 Mercedes-Benz E-Class Sedan  902
 Mercedes-Benz S-Class Sedan  902
 BMW 5-Series Sedan  901
 Audi A6 Sedan  896
 Infiniti M Sedan  894
 Volvo S80  872
   
 Segment Average  902
Speciality Coupe Segment
 Model  Score
 Dodge Challenger  901
 Ford Mustang Coupe  899
 Mini Cooper Hardtop  896
 Volkswagen GTI  891
 Mini Cooper Clubman  884
 Volvo C30  880
 Honda CR-Z  868
 Scion tC  862
 Volkswagen New Beetle Hatchback  861
   
 Segment Average  889
Premium Coupe Segment
 Model  Score
 BMW 1-Series Coupe  917
 BMW 3-Series Coupe  908
 Audi A5 Coupe  896
 Infiniti G37 Coupe  887
 Nissan 370Z Coupe  879
   
 Segment Average  903
Convertible Segment
 Model  Score
 Ford Mustang Convertible  905
 Volkswagen EOS  893
 Mini Cooper Convertible  889
 Mazda Miata MX-5  871
   
 Segment Average  879
Premium Convertible/Roadster Segment
 Model  Score
 Mercedes-Benz E-Class Cabriolet  919
 BMW 1-Series Convertible  907
 BMW 3-Series Convertible  907
 Audi A5 Cabriolet  896
 Infiniti G37 Convertible  893
 Volvo C70  889
   
 Segment Average  905
Standard Pickup Segment
 Model  Score
 Honda Ridgeline  864
 Nissan Frontier  843
 Toyota Tacoma  843
 Chevrolet Colorado  807
 Ford Ranger  794
 Ram Dakota  781
   
 Segment Average  831
Full-size Pickup Segment
 Model  Score
 Ford F-150  906
 Toyota Tundra  889
 GMC Sierra 1500  883
 Chevrolet Avalanche  881
 Nissan Titan  877
 Ram 1500  862
 Chevrolet Silverado  843
   
 Segment Average  862
Heavy-Duty Pickup Segment
 Model  Score
 Ford F-250/350  885
 Chevrolet Silverado 2500/3500  875
 Ram 2500/3500  865
 GMC Sierra 2500/3500  856
   
 Segment Average  874
Minivan Segment
 Model  Score
 Honda Odyssey  860
 Chrysler Town & Country  852
 Volkswagen Routan  844
 Toyota Sienna  838
 Kia Sedona  829
 Dodge Grand Caravan  816
   
 Segment Average  845
Entry Utility Segment
 Model  Score
 Volkswagn Tiguan  880
 Chevrolet Equinox  864
 Kia Sportage  857
 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited  856 
 Honda CR-V  855
 Hyundai Tucson  855
 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport  854
 Ford Escape  852
 Toyota RAV4  850
 Hyundai Santa Fe  850
 Jeep Wrangler  850
 Subaru Forester  845
 Honda Element  844
 Jeep Patriot  831
 Jeep Liberty  831
 Jeep Compass  818
 Dodge Nitro  810
 Mitsubishi Outlander  807
   
 Segment Average  852
Midsize Crossover Utility Segment
 Model  Score
 Ford Flex  886
 Honda Pilot  876
 Nissan Murano  874
 Chevrolet Traverse  870
 Toyota Venza  860
 Mazda CX-9  857
 GMC Acadia  857
 Ford Edge  857
 Toyota Highlander  850
 GMC Terrain  842
 Dodge Journey  838
 Mazda CX-7  825
   
 Segment Average  858
Midsize Traditional Utility Segment
 Model  Score
 Jeep Grand Cherokee  877
 Toyota 4Runner  866
 Kia Sorento  866
 Nissan Pathfinder  855
 Nissan Xterra  850
   
 Segment Average  868
Large Utility Segment
 Model  Score
 Toyota Sequoia  916
 Nissan Armada  879
 Ford Expedition  873
 Chevrolet Tahoe  863
 Chevrolet Suburban  799
   
 Segment Average  862
Near-Luxury Utility Segment
 Model  Score
 Land Rover LR4  923
 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class  902
 Volvo XC60  897
 Audi Q5  893
 Infiniti FX35  888
 Acura RDX  886
 Cadillac SRX  886
 Volvo XC90  883
 Acura MDX  878
 Lexus RX350  877
 Infiniti EX  875
 Volkswagen Touareg  872
 Lexus RX450h  867
 Lincoln MKX  865
 Buick Enclave  862
   
 Segment Average  879
Luxury Utility Segment
 Model  Score
 BMW X6  909
 Audi Q7  906
 Infiniti QX56  903
 BMW X5  901
 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class  898
 Land Rover Range Rover Sport  887
 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class  880
   
 Segment Average  900